🔗 Share this article

Via an unattributed ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court cleared the way for Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that could add as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 decision, released on Thursday, approves a petition by the state to set aside a federal judge's injunction that had struck down the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Explanation

The lower court erroneously placed itself into an active primary campaign, generating significant confusion and disrupting the sensitive equilibrium in elections, the order stated in detailing its action.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably classified voters by their race – a practice known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the boundaries. It had mandated the state to employ the boundaries created after the last decennial survey for the forthcoming election.

Stinging Dissent

Through a strongly worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan objected to the majority's action. She contended that it disregarded the work of the district court, pointing out that its ruling was written by a judge nominated by ex-President Donald Trump.

Our position is above the district court, but our capability is not greater for resolving such fact-driven issues, Kagan stated in a dissent co-signed by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, This court's stay ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be placed in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has declared repeatedly, is a breach of the U.S. Constitution.

National Redistricting Struggle

This decision is part of a national battle over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a slim Republican majority. Ordinarily, redistricting takes place after a decennial population count. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a brazen off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer triggered a wave among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted new maps that could add several additional GOP-friendly seats. Democratic lawmakers, in response, have responded with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the High Court's decision. In a release, he said the order protected Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures representation aligned with the GOP. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

In contrast, opposition party leaders decried the decision. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the head of a major party campaign committee.

A senior Democratic figure argued the court had yet again shredded its standing by rubber-stamping a discriminatory map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he stated.